May the Diaspora Unite

India has been in the media a lot lately, and almost always for the wrong reasons. For every positive news story there are around triple the number of articles countering the news: pretentious and patronising, imperialistic in tone and highly conceited. And the readers comments sections pack such unnecessary venom that it renders me speechless and choking, the inflicted poison refusing to wear off even after twenty-four hours. For months I have endeavoured to voice my own opinions, my notebooks full of resentful writings on random pages, but the level of indignance I have felt has been so overwhelming, I have been at a loss for where to start.

I was sent a link to an article featured in India Today by a friend the other morning: ‘India & A Blonde Tourist: an alternate account’, by Jane von Rabenau. It was a response to Michaela Cross’s report on CNN about her experiences studying abroad in India. Like most people, reading Cross’s report did upset me, brought up feelings of shame and disgust, but after all the articles and comments following the horrific gang-rape in Delhi almost a year ago now, and subsequent reports of violent sexual assaults on tourists, it was like listening to a bad broken record over again whilst desperately anticipating the delivery of a new one, a better one, one with a new and superior melody. Furthermore, the report garnered so much attention and appeared to be pounced upon by the US media as some sort of universal lesson for the developed nations to bear in mind about the culture and society of India. Indians are sexually repressed. Indian men are brazen perverts. Indians turn savage at the sight of fair skin. They scoff irately that India can even consider calling itself the world’s largest democracy.

I can recall such snidely deriding comments being made by both the British media and the public during the run up to the 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi. India was ridiculed and the Western generalisation of Indians as lazy and incompetent was reinforced. This stance continues to embellish the majority of British articles I have read on India: the stench, dirt, and ubiquitous dire poverty appears necessary to adorn travel and culture pieces, with a primitive and backwards depiction of Indian mentality used to set the scene on its society and development commentaries. I observed sanctimonious national pride back in February when David Cameron, though apologetic, defended the British Empire over the 1919 Amritsar massacre and, whilst I was examined on the holocaust and apartheid as part of the GCSE history curriculum, such truths and important historical events relating to the British Raj – the reason anyone from the Indian subcontinent is in Britain in the first place - are swept under the carpet, replaced instead by a subtle, systematically inculcated anti-Indian sentiment. I am even seeing British newspapers commission Indian writers with set agendas, biased viewpoints that match those of the British media, to comment on Indian current affairs, denying the common British public any counter arguments or debates, further enforcing an already long established antipathy – or at least hopeless apathy amongst the reasonable – towards India and Indians.

This is why Jane von Rabenau’s article struck such a chord with me. Not because hers was a beacon of light, nor because I was sentimentally moved by her disapproval of Cross, her humble reasoning ability and her defensive stance, but because it took a white student to make people take note and perhaps accept a little perspective. When Indians talk in defence of their own country, not through pride, but because they are primary witnesses with the ability to objectively attest daily life in current climates, their statements are overlooked, passed off as blind patriotism. If a British newspaper decides Narendra Modi, currently the longest serving chief minister of Gujarat and a leading candidate to becoming India's next prime minister, to be a right-wing Hindu supremacist, then it must be true. Let us pore over all the reports focusing on his alleged involvement in the 2002 Gujarat riots and his condoning the murder of between 790 and 2,000 Muslims, and on the various speculated definitions of Hindu nationalism. Let us ignore the voices of the majority of Indians who, according to opinion polls conducted by such news mediums as The Indian Express and OneIndia News, chose Modi as the preferred next prime minister of their country. What do they know? I too was of this ilk from the moment I heard of the man, back in 2011. I was growing increasingly fretful learning of his possible rise to power, especially because all that was published about him here connoted his anti-Muslim stance, opining that he did not do enough to make minorities in India feel safe, and that he could incite further conflict with Pakistan. As a minority in Britain myself it is the safety, well being, and peace of mind of ethnic minorities worldwide that I hold closest to my heart; it is minorities I sympathise with and relate to. What was happening in India? I read comments from Indian nationals vehemently supporting Modi, but could not understand why. Then my own cousin who lives in India began posting his speeches and applauding him on Facebook. Finally, it only took a little bit of research, a little expansion of my sources of knowledge, to be able to see another side, to understand how millions of ethnically, socially, and religiously diverse people could see hope in someone our media misrepresents as another fascist nut job.  

Why do so many Indians, especially those abroad and those of the diaspora, lack pride in their ancestry? Even Indians in India fail to accept unity. The “modern” youth want to do things the Western way; they too want to pour scorn on the ancient culture and practices inherent in them. Vedic medicine and sciences, spiritual practices, and the universally Indian virtues of tolerance, humility, and benevolence (as noted by the 16^th Century Italian traveller Ludovico di Varthema upon observing the people of Gujarat, and the numerous examples throughout history of Indian kingdoms granting asylum to religiously persecuted refugees of Central Asia and the Middle East – communities that continue to thrive in India to this day) are rapidly being discounted as superstitious rigmarole, traits that make you weak and have no place in economic development. Rather than offer anything constructive, eminent Indians in the media, those turned to for insider information from personal experience, give the West what they want to hear, a variation of what has already been propagated. In a CNN interview with the Indian-born American model and television presenter Padma Lakshmi, she responds to the Delhi gang rape with, amongst other misguided statements, “[sexual discrimination] is ingrained so deeply into our psyche, into our religious texts”. Though she may allude to a suggestion or two towards resolving this serious concern, these are overshadowed by her anecdotes that describe being aggressively leered at whilst popping to the market for cilantro and unbearable sexual harassment on crowded buses on the way to school, both experienced as a teenager.

“So that literally would happen on the bus,” the newsreader asks, unable to conceal her confounded disgust, “that men would touch you and grab you…?”

“Sometimes, yeah.”

Lakshmi then laughs, perhaps nervously, as she describes India’s bus policy of providing reserved seating for women. Why does there have to be this hint of derision, this distinction to be verified between “them” and “look at me now, I've escaped the horrors”? Why the hypocrisy? Von Rabenau quite correctly points out the double standards between an Italian man’s wolf-whistles and stares, often considered a compliment, and an Indian man’s stare, deemed threatening. In most cases, speaking from my personal experience of visiting various parts of India, people are staring from a place of curiosity. Once, on the Delhi metro, I suffered an anxiety attack from the number of passengers I found staring at me, scrutinising me from head to toe. Perhaps the sight of a man with a 1920s inspired haircut, stretch-skinny jeans, and vintage tennis plimsolls was not something East Delhi commuters were accustomed to so early in the morning.

And how about some perspective? The first time I visited India as a preteen I stayed in Gujarat, where my elder cousin and I were driving back late one night from an uncle’s house on her scooter. Upon nearing her neighbourhood a couple of young men on a motorcycle began to follow us. They kept sounding their horns and whistling at my cousin for her attention.

“What are they doing?” I remember asking with fear in my voice. Images of distressing harassment scenes, so common in popular Indian cinema of the 80s and 90s, flashed through my mind. “Why are they following us?”

Just as we were approaching the narrow alley that served as a shortcut to the entrance gate of my cousin’s courtyard house, the youths overtook us and blocked our path. We had been cornered in a deserted and unlit side street. In true Bollywood style there was even an abandoned bullock cart of hay propped against a wall. My heart was racing and I went to hold my cousin tight, praying for the intervention of some hairy-chested, angry hero to leap down from a ten-foot wall. Before the youths were able to utter a word, my cousin leapt from her scooter and charged towards them. She threatened them with a slap so hard it would leave their cheeks burning as red-hot as an iron tawah. They promptly rode off, giggling and cursing to save face.

I have seen women harassed in the same way all over London. Men would call out to them, follow them, pester them incessantly for a hug, a kiss, or a number. I can see the discomfort and unease in these women’s faces as they initially try to ignore the louts. And when they can take it no more, disappearing into a taxi, behind a door, or telling the men where to go, they are met with laughter and abuse. They are ugly slags in any case; their mouths disregarded as unfit for urination. This scene is regularly played out up and down the country.

Of course India has a problem, but what nation does not? Is Britain branded as the paedophile capital of the world? Does every child abuse case look to indigenous British culture and psyche for explanations? And what about the self-imposed unemployed Britons, happy to sit at home or at the pub as they malign immigrants for their work ethic? Any mention of a lazy Briton and the public commentators hit the ceiling. How dare you suggest a Briton to be lazy! You lot need to give us our jobs back. Britain for Britons! Return the Koh-i-noor diamond? Illogical! Acknowledge British atrocities bringing about the devastation and demise of a once powerful civilisation? On yer banana boat mate.

This brings me to that primitive dullard Vinnie Jones and his recent comments to the Radio Times on an unrecognisable Britain, over which I initially lost much sleep. He readily handed himself over to our media to be ripped to shreds over his feeble-mindedness so I can save my time pointing out the baseless bigotry of his every word, but he did give me cause to mull over something of greater significance. His opinions, absurd as they are, seem to hold true for an increasing number of British people. When I was younger this resentment towards foreigners and immigrants appeared to be directed at ethnic minorities for being different, and spending more time with my mum growing up made this difference more apparent. Though my dad and his siblings spoke, acted, and thought like English people (even going so far as to decidedly condemn India as a filthy and smelly place, full of flies), we knew that they were not born here; their stories of racial abuse, although relayed light-heartedly, have marked my mind with a lasting terror to this day. Now we are seen as a threat, as direct competition for work, for accommodation, and for resources. Simpletons like Jones criticise immigration to the UK whilst seeing their own migration almost as an honour bestowed to their host country. In the same way, these people have no idea of the distress or insecurities their thoughtless words can induce in the hearts and minds of those ethnic minorities to whom Britain is the only home they know, a home they were born into, a birthplace that is their primary identity. Should the question arise, ‘where are you from?’, our immediate response is to proclaim Great Britain, or our British city, with as much pride as any full-blooded Englishman. Jones and his obtuse lot see all immigrants as one, be they black, brown, or Eastern European. They do not care to hear how some of our parents and grandparents have worked through blood, sweat and tears to contribute not only to the British Empire, but subsequently also to the British economy and society. How they have staunchly refused to accept a penny in benefits whilst saving up to buy family homes and set up businesses in order to survive, to live as responsible and law abiding citizens, to make something of themselves. In order to support Britons unable to work, pensioners, and the disadvantaged, a great deal of whom continue to fantasise about a Britain devoid of Pakis.

Rather than being so quick to scornfully distinguish ourselves as Punjabis, Bengalis, or Gujaratis, to distance ourselves from Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, or even freshies, all children of the Indian Subcontinent diaspora must stand united. Rather than choose to ignore racist comments, to sit quietly in a corner, we must speak up and correct the statements, educate the uninformed, even if it means stepping out of our comfort zones, confronting those close to us. My sister has a mixed bunch of good friends from working class, council estate backgrounds. She relayed to me recently how one of them, one she is quite close to, throws the word Paki about willy nilly. The latest episode occurred on a night out when some South Asian guy must have accidentally bumped into her in a crowded club. This friend’s instant reaction was to call him a stupid Paki. I asked my sister if she said anything to correct her. She did not. When asked why, my sister responded that it was not her that was being called a Paki. And besides, she was not from Pakistan. One of my closest friends told me just the other day of an incident she encountered on a visit to her boyfriend’s house share. A brother of one of the housemates had come to stay for a few days from out of London. She described him as boorish and opinionated; something about his manner made her feel uneasy. One night, as she and her boyfriend sat in the living room watching television, this man decided it was appropriate to announce that he was “just goin’ down the Paki shop”. My friend looked at her boyfriend in horror, who just shrugged helplessly in response. I asked her why she did not say anything to the man. Her reply was that she just did not want to get into it all with him. 

Consider the Jews of Eastern Europe, once the surviving victims of genocide and now one of the most powerful and influential communities in the United States. They have utilised their influence over Hollywood and the media to constantly remind the world of their plight. They have worked together to build their reputation and authority, not just for themselves but also for Jews the world over. How about African Americans, and the Afro-Caribbean community of Britain? They too have worked just as hard to break down stereotypes and aggressively challenge prejudice in order to achieve the respect and recognition that is owed to them today. All of these communities have used the media to push their stories and to educate the world, in effect glorifying their self-image whilst simultaneously promoting the ostracism of their critics.

What is happening in India should be of significance to us, but they are issues too vast and from which we are isolated. We are constantly reminded of our statuses on visits to the Subcontinent, how we do not belong, how the experience will always be novel for us; we are disregarded as foreigners who could never adjust. And when comments like those of Vinnie Jones explode onto the media, following the recent reports over the Home Office immigration vans targeting people of an “Asian appearance” in specific London boroughs, it is disconcerting because it is being indicated to us that we do not belong in Britain either. We cannot even be classed as nomads, for we do not travel from place to place. If anything, we are in danger of being displaced. It is now up to us; it is the responsibility of those who work within the media, of those who have some influence, to put their faculties to good use in order to educate and inform the masses. Indian history during the British Raj must be taught at schools, including such dark and disturbing truths as Macaulayism, in my opinion the inflicted root cause of Indian mentality today, the many Indian famines under British rule, brought about through greed and selfishness, and the indenturing of Indian labour to all corners of the globe. Writers and directors need to cinematise significant moments in the history of India and its diaspora: colonial attitudes, Indian massacres, partition, the 1972 Expulsion of Indians from Uganda. We need to show the world where we have come from, what values we have brought, and how much we have contributed to our new homelands. In this way, united, we can challenge attitudes and misconceptions, collectively earn respect, and find our place, with reverence, as part of British society.