The Emotional, The Rational, and The Lesson

If you feel no desire for me, then say so.

If you want to live alone, without a lover, then say so.

If your heart holds no place for me, then say so.

Say if it 's so, or say no, but just tell it to me straight.

If my heart is not on fire, then why all this smoke?

There is no incense burning, so what be this oudh I smell?

Why do I love? And why do I doubt?

Why is the moth so eager to burn in the candle's hell?

The tormented words of the 13^th Century Persian poet and Sufi mystic, Jalāl ud-Din Muhammed Rumi, seem to ring true for many a heartbroken, forlorn and confused lover. Read in the original Persian, or Braj Bhāsha and Urdu in the case of Hindustani poetry, a single word carries the weight of a myriad of painful feelings and tormented emotions; English translations appear to fall slightly short in their abilities to convey the true essence dripping heavily from each line. Though a great deal of Sufi and Islamic, and of course Hindu devotional, poetry is directed to the Almighty, that raw longing that tugs desperately at one’s heartstrings is a somewhat universal sentiment.

Just listening to a vocal piece by such classical masters as Farida Khanum or Shobha Gurtu one can imagine tears streaming down the anguished faces and into the trembling mouths belting out such couplets as, “My destroyed heart had only hope to turn to. That too you confiscated from an impoverished me”, and the double entendre behind “Heat erupts from unfulfilled desires: like an oil lamp, I too am routinely burnt come nightfall”, hinting at an unfaithful or even indifferent lover. There are those individuals, the enthusiasts, in whom this grief echoes palpably; their exclamations of adoration and sympathy would rise to the heavens back in the heyday of mahfils assembled under the moon and stars. Each lingering couplet has the effect of holding ones hand over a flame in defiance: a satisfying blistering with a profound purpose.

And then you have those individuals who remark, albeit under their breaths, “Oh lord, what is this depressing music?” willing for it to cease at once. They turn instead to something with a jovial beat and nonsensical uncomplicated lyrics, if any at all.

What is interesting to note is that the sentimental individuals and the seemingly unfeeling rational individuals tend to end up experiencing life together, each one making the other feel inadequate: the pathetic and the stable, the passionate and the bore. I had never considered myself the emotional sort; I still find it uncomfortable engaging in civil body contact with friends and family, let alone embracing strangers and acquaintances. Perhaps I have always been emotional and absurd, but it was never perceived as such because I had managed to maintain distance and express nonchalance. Why did this stance change, and when did my fortress walls begin to decay until they rotted away to ruins? The pathological process had been partly administered, but was largely self-inflicted; my defences peaked, though superficially, before a brutal viral blow by a foreign body took me down, declaring me perpetually susceptible to all forms of oppression, exploitation, and emotional plunder. I have become that figurative welcome mat who is always stepped on, though I had strived – and preached – more than anything for this very predicament to be avoided.

The past two years since my last post, which have flown by almost unnoticed, have been by and large uneventful: I travelled to India, staying with my cousin in New Delhi over the month of September 2011 before commencing an Integrated Masters degree in Ayurvedic Medicine at a London university the following month. Moved to question my ambitions, my future, and my relationship by Delhi’s spellbinding culture and history, juxtaposed with its unbefitting yet agreeably sparkling modernity, I returned somewhat enlightened to the philosophies of conjugal life, yet equally pervaded by inflicted doubts. Was I settling for what was comfortable? Were there greener pastures? What were the moral implications? I happened to chance upon someone; they were different and they were initially more interested in me than I was in them. Though there were direct physical similarities with my ex, this person carried the cool demeanour, the zeal, and the mischief my ex had lost over the years – what I believed at the time to crave for in the relationship. This, encouraged by my unfounded doubts and insatiable demands along with the ex’s utter lack of ardour, and valour in the face of possible separation, ultimately caused our relationship of five and a half years to abruptly end. My new infatuation also failed to last; it was tumultuous and demeaning, serving only to irritate a tender wound before a stinging vitriolage. My ex maintained a fully supportive stance throughout the whole ordeal, offering sound, objective advice, a shoulder to cry on, and even a body to release on; I was shown such unconditional kindness and understanding. I began to value the philosophies and knowledge I had picked up in India and through Ayurveda and the Brahma Kumaris, appreciate the beauty in this fun-size deity that had been bestowed upon my life. I had made a grave error in taking what we had for granted, and wanted everything to return to as it was. But I had gotten ahead of myself. I was blinded to the fact that my exalted deity was yet a mere mortal also experiencing epiphanies of their own, suddenly claiming to be enjoying single life with gusto – free x-rated self portraits and a cheeky kiss for every eligible applicant. I was emotionally and physically cut off in the blink of an eye. This unexplained change of tune quickly reduced me to utter devastation and uncertainty. As a result, I only just managed to scrape through my first year at university, still wounded, still ceaselessly confused, and still not in the least bit prepared or capable. It has been in this state of bewilderment – anxious, negative rumination in a limbo of hope and despair – that over a year has passed.

Whilst family and friends had expressed deep concern over my losing myself, over social withdrawal and the dangers of developing a submissive personality, my former partner appeared to take everything in their stride. Pleas to talk and proposals for improvement have been consistently rebuffed, almost as if switched on to autopilot; detachment and subsequent cold bloodedness have been taken to with ease. But only seemingly so. I may choose to voice my sentiments, relay my doubts and concerns to my closest friends, or even learn to regulate my emotions through various creative outlets or spiritual guides, but what of the rational, unsentimental lot? Should they be viewed as cruel and unfeeling by default because they choose to keep their woes contained within them, because they manage their emotions differently? Despite what the truth may be, my ex claims to want no part in any meeting, dating, or random sex for the unforeseeable future; they are content in their own company. I have been unable to focus on anything but the procurement of my lost love, or at least something to replace it: a passionate kiss, television serials in bed, enjoying one another’s company over plenty of alcohol followed by unruly sex. Every other aspect of my life has been allowed to suffer in the absence of this, so how can it be that someone would choose to reject this fundamental want? And thus negative thoughts of self doubt, lies, and betrayal abound, churning all the time and with each new, out of character incident.  

I recently found myself engaging in a rare, deep conversation with my dad on a drive back from Brent Cross. He was asking me what I was doing with my life, whether I wanted to settle down and get married. I told him that I was not ready, and most likely never see myself settling down in the conventional sense; I did not think anyone would be prepared to give me what I want.

“You know, you’re never happy with anything,” he said to me in his soft Cockney accent. “You and your sister, you’re both like your mum actually. All sensitive and irrational. Hot headed.”

I encouraged him to elaborate and he went on to relay his relationship with my mum. Before she chose her path to spirituality and embraced austerity almost fifteen years ago, she had always been a rather passionate person, full of emotions and enthusiasm, easily angered and stubborn, yet just as easily placated and yielding. Being the youngest of five children, she was accustomed to roguery and fighting for attention, and was the queen bee of her hometown, counting the granddaughters of zamindars and former maharajas among her closest friends. Playing on a beach during a visit to Bombay in the 1970s, she was spotted by the late Dev Anand, a legend of Indian Cinema, and was approached on his behalf to audition for a role in his next film. Her brother strictly forbade her and ordered her return home to immediate effect. Moving to London dampened neither her verve, nor her aggression: whilst parking on double yellows she would get into verbal fights with outraged Jamaicans proclaiming, “because you are black, you think I am a scared of you?” and once demanded my uncle come downstairs and face her so that she can slice him open and rub salt into his flesh after he had threatened my dad over a domestic financial issue.   

“It’s all too much man,” dad continued. “I’m not the kind of person who’s happy to just sit there and stare at your face all day. What do I want to do that for? That’s what your mum was like, wanted me around all the time: watch TV together, eat together, sleep together.”

So what did he want her to do? I asked him. Did he regret failing to pay her sufficient attention since she had enforced strict celibacy and detachment onto their marriage?

“Well… I suppose I could have been more attentive, but I don’t regret anything. It’s just not the kind of person I am. I believe that a marriage, or any relationship for that matter, has that honeymoon period when everything’s nice and you all love each other. But after that, you’ve got to lead your own lives.”

I did not understand.

“You know, you do your thing, she does her thing, and at certain times of the year you meet in the middle… Like on holidays, or a dinner and dance…”

I was speechless. “You know what dad, I can’t even blame mum for the decisions she’s made in her life. With opinions like that, poor mum…”

My dad continued to defend himself, reiterating that people are just different, what makes one person tick could be the biggest bore to someone else. He went on to tell me one more anecdote, of the apparent final straw for my mum. She had introduced him a while back to her new friends, a mirthful family of Mangalorean Catholics who lived a few doors down. Finding such a rapport with Mr Rodriguez, something quite rare for a man as reserved and withdrawn as my dad, he found himself spending most evenings and almost every weekend at their house. They would drink beers and rum, talk electronics as they played cards or darts, gorge themselves on deliciously spiced, coconut laced pork curries, and laugh heartily in merriment.

“I mean, you can’t live life like that day in day out, but it was fun at the time. Okay, I’m happy to have given up meat and alcohol – I never really liked pork anyway – but we had a laugh. You’re mum wasn’t happy, mind. You know what she’s like, asking me what I’d like for dinner and waiting up for me so we can go to bed together.”

I empathised with my mum completely, being reminded of the times I would stay up until the early hours of the morning in wait of the ex to return from a night out. It was out of worry; you simply want to know and acknowledge that the person you love is safely beside you, that they are not lying somewhere in an alley, drunk out of their minds and choking on their own bile. It is not something that manifests entirely from control, as is generally falsely perceived. If anything, there is a sense of loss felt in their absence. That we are missing out on precious moments that could be spent together – even if it does mean simply staring at each other all day.

“She started trying to control me. Like wanting to know when I’d be home and telling me I can’t go out. Fuck that man, I don’t answer to anyone.”

“So then?”

“One night I’d had one too many and she went mad. And that was it. She started going to those spiritual talks and just got drawn into it further from there.”

I told him it seemed as if she had given up. Her last thread of hope had been confiscated and she was left destitute, just like Farida Khanum. Only God could offer her the unreserved love she craved.

My dad was not convinced. He does not believe that you should need to rely on anyone, not for companionship, nor for support. One must keep oneself busy.

My mother and I share both our astrological sun sign in Leo, and our Vedic moon sign in Pisces. We get along famously, but we have recently discovered that we simply cannot live in close quarters. Our similarities are much too strong – not in terms of our likes and dislikes, rather our personalities: our staunch steadfastness in our personal beliefs and values, the stubbornly obsessive way in which we exert our control over our domains, and our hopeless loyalty and dedication to people. Where Western Leo traits include generosity, forgiveness, and fervour with pride and melodrama, the Vedic Pisces is a creative, idealist dreamer prone to escapism in the face of difficulty. Affection is what these sentimental romantics crave more than anything, and old age sees them tend towards a spiritual path. So is that my lot? To yearn for something so unattainable that I am forced to ultimately dedicate my remaining years to spiritual practice? I have seen my mother suffer in her denial, flushing Amaranth pink with frustration at having to suppress her natural urges. When I used to live at home, and my sisters still inform me of its intermittent continuation, every few months or so would see my mother simply erupt with irritation, like a pressure cooker, her wrath incurred individually by each sibling; abusive language spews forth, possessions eject from windows, a war cry of pots, cutlery, and kitchen unit door-slams reverberates menacingly throughout the house.  It is a release mingled with self-torture: she alienates her children, harms herself and her utensils, and creates a resentful atmosphere vibrating through the household for days. This appears to be in line with the poets: the attention turns from wine, bisexual lust, and subsequent self pity and longing in their youth to the Ocean of Love in their old age, still searching in vain for a stronger union, a closer bond with the Almighty. Perpetually searching.

But does this make the logical individual any better off? Is my dad any more at peace? Does he radiate calm and bliss? Is he free from all the dramas the universe throws at him? Where the emotional one has swallowed poison, or fallen into a drunken stupor, the rational one is imprisoned in his own self-imposed responsibilities and restrictions. He will be the unfortunate one to pass away overlooked, absorbed by his obligations and alone with his detachment.

When the ego is correctly managed, the union between an emotional person and a rational person is capable of, if not ideal for, perfect harmony. Without a need for any expectations, the emotional one has the power to lift up the rational one, inspire them, make them laugh, and sprinkle a dusting of sparkles over their otherwise rigid and enervated world. Opened up, the rational person has the ability to ground the emotional one, give them drive and a sense of direction. They can provide structure and offer a wider perspective to assist in the overcoming of obstinacy. They each give the other purpose and meaning. Each has their own role to play in the theatre of life: without the expressive, the world would lack creative artists, beauty, and pleasure; it would lose its heart. A want for the reasonable may just well cause the very fabric of society to fray, susceptible to languor and licentiousness.

When I had first drafted this piece over a month ago, I had concluded that acceptance and appreciation were of paramount importance in any relationship. One could spend an entire lifetime searching for the perfect one when in reality no such individual exists. One could also insist on living in wilful denial, determined to being satisfied in ones own company whilst undergoing a constant mental battle to maintain this stance. When stripped of pride and vanity, of false ego, when you look deep within yourself, you know exactly whose soul your own eternally connects to. You can feel the many past and future lifetimes to come of meeting this one significant person over and over again. This is the true source of fate and a possible explanation for déjà vu. Despite the storm, regardless of its extent, there will always be the promise of calm waters and ultimately land ahoy. It has all been predestined and there is hope and solace in this.

However, I have since learnt a more valuable truth. I began to consider why so many people turn to religion and austerity in the face of despair and rejection. It has been said that the love of God is immense and absolute. It does not judge, nor does it criticize. In fact, it does not scoff, argue, or speak back at all. There are a set of principles and conducts suggested to bring you closer to Him, with final results of immeasurable spiritual delight and blissful detachment from the world and its scrutiny. It is a reflective experience. One need not rely on the whims of a mortal lover to test the maintenance of their character; one has been bestowed with divine knowledge and power to maintain control over themselves.

Find the strength and determination to follow your own principles. It is not necessary to lose yourself and deny the world around you, deny what makes you happy and what makes you tick. Discover as many positive qualities as you can about yourself and delight in them. Weed out all the negative and destructive habits. Use past pain as a lesson, and most importantly accept yourself before expecting others to accept you. As long as you know deep in your heart that you are doing the right thing, causing no one hurt or harm, being truthful and respectful, fulfilling your duties towards those that depend on you, know that you are safe; allow nothing external to phase you.

It would be ideal strolling through life with warm fingers securely interlocking your own, but I would much rather walk beside someone sincere than have someone follow me obligingly through persuasion, necessity, or even from responsibility. Be they emotional, rational, or none of the above.

My mother during her honeymoon to Venice in 1982. The man smoking is not my dad, but an Italian tour guide.

Is Attachment The Fountainhead Of All Sorrow?

Is attachment the fountainhead of all sorrow?

I have been reminded today that every time I experience distress, it’s root lay festering in the polluted mud of attachment; destructive spores of negative thought intermittently attack at its fragility.

Last night, in a state of acute insomnia through anxiety, I turned to Dadi Janki’s Inside Out. No, I have not misspelled the name of one strapping, Puerto Rican raggaeton artist, nor was I up all night reading his autobiography. Dadi Janki (meaning Grandmother Janki in Hindi) is one of the founding members of the Brahma Kumari’s World Spiritual University, “an international organisation working at all levels of society for positive change”. The organisation was established in the late 1930’s in Sindh, presently a province of Pakistan, as a mouthpiece for spiritual teaching. It enlightens its students with a divine understanding of the self largely through meditation and positive thinking.

Being the last day before the Easter Bank holidays, and the subsequent Bank holiday thanks to the Royal Wedding (prompting the company I work for to mercifully close for a full eleven days), last night I anticipated being in receipt of my first full month’s pay after my abrupt, unfair dismissal back in January. Naturally, this was a triumphant moment for me; I would finally be back in the position to pay off my outstanding bills, ready to pay the first instalments of my Council Tax and utility bills and would be back on the track to financial stability. I must have been overly enthusiastic. After 1am in the morning, I logged onto my Internet Banking only to discover that my Building Society had heedlessly withdrawn my overdraft facilities. I was still slightly overdrawn after my salary had been paid into the account but was now without an overdraft so, therefore, without access to a penny of my earnings. I went into a state of hysteria: How was I going to contribute towards my bills? How was I going to get through the month?? How on Earth was I going to be able to acquire more funds??? Telephone banking operated on a strict 9am-5pm schedule and there was nothing I could do for the next eight hours. Nothing whatsoever!

I grudgingly got into bed whereupon increased levels of panic set in amidst the encompassing silence and the elaborate worrying. I attempted to read Nietzsche for inspiration, I considered turning on the television to a food channel or a nature documentary for its alleviating drone to overwhelm my angst. I tried to meditate but gave up almost instantly, declaring to myself that to clear my mind was, at that point, akin to a crack at clearing away all the consequences of man-made contamination imposed upon the Earth.

By my bedside, I caught a glimpse of a vivid, pink lotus flower set against a deep jade background; Inside Out. I opened it at a random page near the beginning and began to read, “Free yourself from the crisis that you create through your own negativity. There are so many external crises you can’t even count them. There is nothing you can do about that. But the crisis you create in your own mind, according to the quality of your thoughts – at least put a stop to that.” I read another quote, “To experience sorrow is an act of senselessness. Remember this very well. When you feel sorrow about something, understand that you are lacking some understanding. For whom should I feel sorrow? Does it help either me or others?”

My thinking quickly began to cease. There really was nothing I could do about my situation – not at that moment anyway. It was useless for me to agonize over my options and lose sleep over it; I had to get up for work in almost four hours. Ultimately, all I would suffer would be the irksome bother of inconvenience, the delay; there were always, always other options available. Reading these quotes over and over again, I managed to clear my head. Of course, flashes of fret did indeed strike momentarily through my mind but I was now in firm control of my thoughts and able to put a stop to them.

“…to become upset… about something, even to have an off-mood, is like putting a drop of poison into a pot of nectar. It spoils everything. It doesn’t just take away peace, it brings unhappiness.”

This was the last quote I repeated to myself before drifting off and this very concept is what set my day the following morning. I was full of positive energy and rearing to go, encouraged further by the fact that it was my last day at work before my extended Easter break. The sun was beaming, the air was heavily scented with the aroma of spring blossom and the weather had chosen to remain as delightfully warm as it had been all week, quite atypical for April. At work, I happened to find myself being connected with the most kindest and genuinely obliging advisor when I called the Building Society first thing at 9am. She immediately reinstated my overdraft limit with no qualms and I was back in working order; the three hours I had spent driving myself crazy the night before were, after all, an utter waste of time and, above all, a complete depletion of energy.

All was calm.

A couple of hours later, I received a text. G, my other half, was already set to celebration mode and was informing me of probable plans to go out late that night with a regular group of close friends. Dark clouds began to form.

G undergoes a monthly depilatory process preceding a haircut. Over the past year or so I have made a mental note of this practice, even sat there watching the process (having always been left titillated by the delectable full view of the outcome), which is generally followed by a meticulous beauty regime, observing that G has almost always left for a night out once impeccably groomed. Even the construction of the perfect outfit for the night seems to take an age to achieve if it has not already been conscientiously contrived well in advance.

What I have always failed to come to grips with is why someone in a five-year relationship would feel a need to tend to their body hair in preparation of a night that should comprise exclusively of no more than alcohol, bitching and dancing. Why get a haircut and make such an effort to look your best for a night out? Why not exert yourself for me once in a while? Over the years, simple uncertainties have deteriorated to form deep suspicions. Alone in my flat with nothing but idle time I create clear images of my better half bending over, Dutty Wine-ing in the middle of the dance floor; a long queue of men stand in line to cop a feel, to pinch the alluring tight backside or to manage an underhanded caress of that impeccably maintained crotch through the provocative, silky underwear of my companion, my confidant, my soul mate, MY CROTCH!

And that is where the trouble begins, with this damned insistence of ‘my’ and ‘mine’; attachment through possession. This particular form of attachment seems to engulf you silently overnight. It judiciously selects individuals you have chosen to keep close to your heart with the intention to drive them further away. As it does this, attachment itself, after conquering your heart, moves on to occupy and secure your mind; it rules your thoughts, dictates your actions and mars intelligence and good sense.

What is worse is that, in the present age of social networking, we have the means and opportunities to indulge negative forms of attachment; mobile phones, smartphones, computers and laptops. Through these mediums, we feed the insanity of our attachments to the point where we no longer have control of our bodies. Against our better judgement, we find ourselves reading through text messages, signing in to our partner’s email accounts and logging on to personal websites, all the while allowing ourselves to get pulled down further into a dangerous abyss of jealousy, anger, hatred and irrationality. We delude ourselves into believing that our partners should pledge sole allegiance to us; they should keep no secrets from us; they should love us and pleasure us unconditionally and they should relish in this. After all we do for them!

I responded to G’s text, making clear my sentiments. Anger, fuelled by indignation, had seized my entire being. How many meet-ups and nights out had I unobtrusively cancelled because G did not approve of the company? Or because I knew G had had a strenuous working day and because I wanted to make sure a hearty, healthy, favourite dinner was prepared and ready in time? How many friends and acquaintances have I had to cut myself off from just because they indulged in social drug-use or had expressed a physical interest in me? How much have I had to alter my entire life and personality in order to keep G happy and feeling secure?

“Internally, people do create many difficult situations for themselves. Arrogance, for, example, makes you feel disrespect and causes you sorrow. Arrogance brings a desire for regard and respect and when you don’t receive these you feel it to be an insult. ‘Look, I do so much for them, but this is how they repay me.’ If I give from the heart and don’t have arrogance, I wont have such feelings.”

Despite G’s hopeless frustration and subsequent insistence on staying home for a night in together, despite my prior, divine knowledge and my better judgement, in spite of myself, I remained vexed. At the same time, the sun remained warm and intensely radiant. No dark clouds accumulated themselves over its splendour, it did not rain, nor did the cool, gentle breeze attempt to pick up its pace with a biting malice. In observation of all this, over a stroll during my lunch break, I began to think clearly again, to see the bigger picture. Young children on their end of term holidays were laughing with their parents, trying to balance on their bicycles with one hand holding a generously served, rapidly melting ice cream cone. Teenage girls and unemployed youths walked to the park next door to my block of flats gossiping and giggling in groups and donning mini skirts, bare chests and suggestive smiles. Even the lonely spinsters and idle housewives were out jovially walking their dogs or jogging with determination and a smile.

Why was I causing myself so much grief when there was so much to be grateful for? What was I achieving by holding a grudge so unnecessarily and for nothing?

“People feel sorrow when they are holding on to situations. They forget that these situations are external to them. All it takes is to let go. Once they achieve this, they become happy and peaceful again and can begin to smile. How often have we looked back on some previous trouble and wondered what all the fuss was about?”

After all, G and I have built a strong relationship over five years and we are still together. If anything were to have gone awry, surely it would have been communicated by now. I must admit, G has put up with a lot from me; even last year, when I had suddenly become conscious of a love from my past, began discussing marriage, G remained by my side full of support, content with whatever guaranteed my own happiness so long as we remained in each other’s lives. Would this not have been the perfect opportunity for G to break free, or to go forth and indulge in sexual discovery through experiences with many other men? Why do logical arguments like this not arise in the mind when we are self harming with needless insecurities and jealousy? Why do we constantly choose to immerse ourselves in our negative emotions when it is much easier, and would actually relieve us, to simply let go?

We are so full of ego that to even consider this alternative of letting go is to compromise our strength; we would appear submissive, ineffectual and ultimately weak. We fail to realise our potential to become greater, happier and ultimately in control. To let go does not necessarily mean to give in. Still we wallow in doubts and suspicion, draining our energy and mental powers.

Suspicion is, after all, an exhausting obsession. This senseless, fabricated need to own someone is what drives our desire to control them, to coerce them to submit. And we want to own them because we are attached to them; we want them to be compliantly ours for as long as we need them.

So is attachment truly the fountainhead of all sorrow? I personally believe so. For those whose egos cause them sorrow, they are still attached to their own self image, are they not? For those who have experienced intense anger towards their loved ones, it stems from some form of frustration through attachment. We become frustrated and agitated when something is not done right, or executed in a particular way, or if we are not being listened to, for example. If we had not been overly attached to our loved ones, if we were not so reliant, we could happily manage by ourselves. We could act with our loved ones without any expectations. It is expectation, after all, that leads to disappointment.

It is attachment that makes us want to shake our siblings when they repeatedly disregard your good advice. Can we not allow people to learn from their own mistakes? It is attachment that makes us feel let down by our closest friends. Can we not learn to be self sufficient, without the assistance or approval of those we have chosen to revere? It is attachment that instils us with fear through jealousy and distrust. Who are we to take control of anyone’s life when we have yet to learn how to successfully manage our own?

I am not sure if it is possible to defeat attachment. We are human after all; since birth we have only been rewarded when expressing attachment, from that first bawl for our mothers. We are attached to our bedrooms, our possessions, even to futile talismans; it is almost like a second nature!

“You need to attend to the quality of the thoughts that you allow to come to your mind. This is only sensible. It is, after all, your mind. Thoughts should be pure, elevated and determined. Then just see the results. Without rituals, postures, chanting, etc, you will experience peace of mind.”

A negative emotion is amongst the most difficult to counter. You can try your best to think positive until the cows come home, but that is only possible once you have cleared the negative from your mind. It is pointless to be determined about a situation yet to still harbour doubts – even the smallest, most insignificant of misgivings will swamp your efforts and take you back to square one.

So train yourself to haul your mind out from the depths of this most repugnantly malodorous pool of negative effluence. Whether your demise be attachment, ego, greed or lust, change your thought process in order for you to avoid the fatuous fallout of sorrow and negativity. What we fail to realise is that thoughts and emotions are contagious; they can be picked up subtly by those who we hold dearest to us, those who know us. These people suffer equally when we do, though they may not explicate it. If we cannot change ourselves for our own benefit, let us at least strive for a positive change to help keep our loved ones, those who will always, unconditionally hold our best interests as their reason for being.

Why choose the difficult task of willing to see rain clouds when your sky is indefinitely forecast to be clear with warm sun?